Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Evans vs Jeremy Chardy Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Evans vs Chardy analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Evans vs Jeremy Chardy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Evans has won 51.28% of points on his second serve, while Chardy has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Evans, in recent form, has won 50.44% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chardy has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.24% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Evans has saved 59.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chardy has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Evans has won 35.14% of matches played (W/L 13/ 24), with Chardy winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 46/ 52). Chardy has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 210/ 162), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 152/ 146).
- Player level: In the last year, Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 29.41% of matches (W/L 5/ 12), where as Chardy has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 7 times before with Evans winning 4 times. They have played 19 sets in total, with Evans winning 10 and Chardy winning 9. The last match between Evans and Chardy was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 19-01-2023, Second, Hard with Daniel Evans getting the victory 6-4 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Evans and Chardy have played a deciding set 3 times, with Evans winning 2 times and Chardy 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Evans winning 1, and Chardy 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Evans has played against opponents with an average rank of 133.81 while Chardy has played against players with an average rank of 43.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Evans has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chardy has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Evans has converted 31.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chardy has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Evans 4 - 3 Chardy
67
Rank
21
High
33
Age
R
Plays
4
Total3
3
Hard1
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
876
Rank
25
High
37
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
60% (551-371)
Career Total W/L
54% (494-426)
27% (4-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,736,130
Career Prize Money
$5,487,593
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Evans | Jeremy Chardy |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 10 | 9 |
| Games Won | 94 | 85 |
| Aces (Total) | 52 | 52 |
| DFs (Total) | 14 | 21 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:4 | 1:55:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (372/555) | 67% (390/580) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (256/372) | 68% (265/390) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (103/183) | 46% (87/190) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (24/52) | 35% (18/52) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (228/580) | 35% (196/555) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 7-6(6) 6-7(7) 6-2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
75%
(
82 of
110)
1st Serve %
68%
(
84 of
124)
13
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
34 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
124)
125
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
| 6-4 1-6 6-2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| 2-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Evans
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
15
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Evans
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
32 of
39)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Evans
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
11
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
99
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Evans | Jeremy Chardy |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 27% (4/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 37% (14/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (169/202) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 54 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:39 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 153.13 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (669/1176) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (467/669) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (260/507) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 31% (29/93) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (414/1189) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (4/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Hugo Grenier
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Daniel Evans
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Daniel Evans
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Daniel Evans
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
21
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
35 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
20 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Daniel Evans
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
12
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Daniel Evans
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jeremy Chardy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Jeremy Chardy
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Jeremy Chardy
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Jeremy Chardy
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
61%
(
96 of
157)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
7
Aces
2
14
Double Faults
4
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
43%
(
26 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
42%
(
66 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
146
Total Points Won
133
|
1-6 7-5 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Jeremy Chardy
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
17
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
77)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
23 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
120)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Jeremy Chardy
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jeremy Chardy
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Liam Broady
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
11
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Evans Vs Chardy Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniel Evans
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
